Make an Appointment: [email protected] | 210-957-1668

  • Part II — Naming the Pattern: How to Identify Antagonistic Behaviors Without Gaslighting Yourself

    There is an ache that lives beneath many holiday tables — the ache of wondering whether what you remember is real.

    So many of us walk into family spaces feeling a quiet confusion humming beneath our ribs. Something feels “off,” but we don’t have language for it. We leave feeling small, uncertain, or even ashamed, and we question whether we’re imagining things. We tell ourselves, They probably didn’t mean it like that. Maybe I’m too sensitive. Maybe I should just get over it.

    This self-doubt is not accidental. It is often the residue of growing up in systems where your inner knowing was not welcomed — or worse, where it was systematically dismantled.

    In Set Boundaries, Find Peace, Nedra Glover Tawwab reminds us that

    “Being able to trust your own feelings and assert your needs is the beginning of healing.”

    But in order to trust your feelings, you have to first be able to name what’s happening.And naming antagonism — especially in the people we love — can feel like stepping into holy fire.

    Today, we’re going to practice identifying antagonistic dynamics without minimizing ourselves, without rationalizing harm, and without betraying our bodies. We are not doing this to place blame or to create villains. We are doing it because telling the truth is an act of liberation.

    bell hooks teaches:

    “Honesty is the first step in love.”

    Naming what is true isn’t a rejection of love — it is the doorway to it.

    Why It’s Hard to See Antagonism Clearly

    Many of us were not allowed to tell the truth growing up. We were taught to present a certain face to the world — to keep the family image intact. Sometimes we learned early that acknowledging harm would result in punishment, abandonment, ridicule, or silence. Sometimes we saw that the adults around us simply couldn’t handle the truth, so we learned to swallow it.

    The nervous system reacts to this, not by erasing memory, but by burying it under layers of self-doubt. Gregory Bateson, writing on systems, suggests that this is not random — systems protect their shape. Families that rely on denial will condition members to invalidate their own perceptions. If you begin to see clearly, to name what’s happening, it disrupts the system’s equilibrium. The system resists — not because truth isn’t present, but because truth introduces change.

    So when you feel yourself minimizing or explaining away harmful behavior, it doesn’t mean you’re weak. It means your system trained you well to survive. Your body remembers what it cost to speak up.

    It makes perfect sense that clarity feels dangerous.

    What Antagonism Feels Like

    Antagonism is not only screaming, shaming, or obvious cruelty. Often, it is subtle. It can be polite. It can smile. It can happen with a hug attached.

    The simplest way to begin identifying antagonism is not by focusing on what someone does but by noticing what happens inside you.

    Does your body contract when they enter the room?Do you feel nervous when you know you’ll see them?Do you leave interactions feeling smaller, confused, or responsible for their emotions?Do you feel like you have to manage their reactions, or else something might break?

    Your body is telling the story.Your feelings are data.

    bell hooks reminds us that

    “Our hearts know our deepest secrets and desires.”

    If your heart is uneasy, listen.If your body whispers, believe it.

    Behaviors That Undermine Safety

    While antagonism is contextual and relational, there are common patterns that erode safety over time. You may recognize some of these behaviors, though your experience will have its own shape.

    There are people who always have something to say — not to understand, but to correct. When you share something meaningful, they pivot the conversation toward themselves. When you’re vulnerable, they minimize your experience or tell you that they “didn’t mean it like that,” as though impact disappears if intent is declared innocent.

    You might notice that every disagreement somehow becomes your fault. They rewrite the story so that your feelings become overreactions, your boundaries become insults, and their behavior becomes justified — a kind of emotional sleight of hand that turns the truth inside out.

    Sometimes antagonism looks like feigned concern:“I just want what’s best for you.”But the “best” always seems to require your compliance.

    Sometimes antagonism is wrapped in humor — a “joke” about your body, your career, your partners, your gender. And if you don’t laugh, suddenly you’re the problem. You’re too sensitive. You can’t take a joke.

    And sometimes antagonism is the absence of care: the way someone withholds affection, interest, or warmth unless you are behaving the way they want.

    These patterns, over time, train you to perform or disappear.

    What matters is not whether the behavior looks “nice,” but whether you feel safe.

    Nedra Glover Tawwab writes:

    “If you are constantly feeling unsure about your place in someone’s life, it is time to reevaluate that relationship.”

    Your uncertainty is not personal failure — it is a sign the relationship may not be reliable.

    The Difficulty of Naming Harm

    There is a tenderness in confronting the truth that the people we love have harmed us. It can feel like a betrayal, even when we’re simply telling the truth. It can stir grief, rage, guilt, and longing. It might feel disloyal to speak honestly about family members who did the best they could — even when their best was not enough.

    It helps to remember that naming harm is not an indictment of someone’s entire being. It is simply acknowledging a pattern that has shaped you.

    bell hooks offers this clarity:

    “Abuse and neglect negate love.”

    She doesn’t say they complicate love.She says they negate it.

    When care and harm coexist repeatedly, we begin to question whether what we received was ever truly love — or simply attachment, obligation, fear, habit, or survival.

    Naming this is not unkind.It is the first compassionate act toward yourself.

    The Fog of Gaslighting

    Many of us learned to distrust ourselves because the adults around us were not able to validate our perceptions. We were told to “stop exaggerating,” “let it go,” “stop making drama,” or “forget about it.” Over time, our inner compass becomes shaky. We stop believing what our bodies tell us. We learn to override our feelings, and eventually, we may not recognize ourselves.

    This internal confusion is not a flaw. It is the aftereffect of growing up in an environment that asked you to deny your reality in order to belong.

    Gregory Bateson speaks of “double binds,” situations in which a person receives conflicting messages they cannot resolve. Family systems built on denial create double binds; you are asked to pretend that what hurt you didn’t hurt. You are asked to love at the cost of truth.

    It is no wonder so many of us feel lost trying to understand what is real.

    Healing begins when you listen to your body before you listen to anyone else.Your body has never lied to you — it just hasn’t always been allowed to speak.

    Beginning to Name the Truth

    Naming antagonism is not about labeling someone as good or bad. It’s about acknowledging how their behavior lands in your body and your emotional landscape.

    Ask yourself gently:

    When I am with this person, do I feel more or less like myself?Do I feel respected?Do I feel listened to?Do I feel safe to be honest?Do I leave feeling nourished or depleted?

    If you struggle to answer, try noticing the physical sensations that arise: tightness, nausea, numbness, buzzing, a desire to run or go quiet. Our bodies respond before language arrives.

    As Tawwab tells us, boundaries are not about controlling others — they are about honoring ourselves. Identifying harmful dynamics is simply the beginning of that honoring.

    Grief as Teacher

    As we name the patterns that have harmed us, grief often comes forward. We might grieve the parents we needed and did not have. We might grieve the version of family we wish could exist — the one where we are seen, where our pronouns are respected, where our partners are welcomed, where our bodies are not criticized, where our silence is not expected.

    Grief is not a sign that you have failed at healing.It is evidence that you dared to love and hoped to be loved well.

    bell hooks reminds us that love is an action — a practice made visible through care, commitment, responsibility, respect, and trust. When these elements are absent, love cannot take root.

    Your grief honors what should have been possible.

    You Are Not Imagining It

    If you feel unsafe, you are.If something feels off, it is.If your body tightens, listen.

    There is no award for enduring discomfort that harms you.There is no virtue in pretending painful dynamics are acceptable.

    Your clarity does not make you dramatic.Your boundaries do not make you cold.Your truth does not make you cruel.

    Honoring your inner knowing is an act of devotion to your aliveness.

    The Tender Work Ahead

    In this season of returning — to places, traditions, versions of ourselves — the work is not to become someone your family can tolerate. The work is to remain anchored in who you’ve become, even if others refuse to see you.

    Naming antagonism is not the end of the story. It is the beginning of your reclamation.

    In the next piece of this series, we will explore how to prepare your nervous system and plan your boundaries before gatherings — not to create conflict, but to create safety inside yourself.

    For now:Take a breath.Feel your feet.Place a hand on your heart if that feels comforting.

    You are not too sensitive.You are not imagining it.You are waking up.

    And I’m here.

    Always.